That's what Rab thinks anyway, and I won't disagree to it on the whole. I however do think that there are some corporations which establish ventures to make the living of the poor better. Of course they are interested profit. They wouldn't be a corporation if they did not! But there are ventures which try to "do good by doing good". Earning profit by providing base of the pyramid poor better quality life. The poor get good and the corporations get good. So who loses?
One thing that hit me a lot during todays lecture was how retail corporations (?) such as Nike, Adidas, and Zara take advantage of the infrastructure that the IMF and world bank has forced poor countries to create. One huge issue in both developed and developing countries is to cut back on producing costs. The corporations achieve this by locating factories within good infrastructurual web, and giving cheaper salary to the workers. So maybe the cheaper the product, the more the poor are being swindled out of their salaries. Also the infrastructure has been made by the country's, the people's money. "doing good by doing good" is something that corporation have to do, in order to pay back for the money the poor have payed in the first place.



